MMA FORUM
It is currently Mon Jan 05, 2009 9:42 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:24 am 
Offline
Brown(2) Belt
Brown(2) Belt

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
Posts: 1125
Location: Buxton, Derbyshire, UK (But Proud to be Welsh)
Damn Kensie you are a great voice of reason, I didn't hear that interview but I agree with both what Machida said and what you have said...
Both fighters offered something different threat wise but Tito although showed little against him looked better than soko.

Soko looked out of his depth, maybe it was inexperience and nerves with it being his first UFC fight, tito was just made to look bad by a fighter who had him scouted perfectly. Although I think the same can be said for soko i think the real soko didn't turn up.

_________________
Love all mma, and big UFC fan but I do miss Pride.
And flying the flag for the UK... GO BISPING!
Absolutly love boxing and Calzaghe and Hatton are my Favourite fighters EVER!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:32 am 
Offline
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:12 pm
Posts: 5448
Location: Canada
fightDR wrote:
Damn Kensie you are a great voice of reason, I didn't hear that interview but I agree with both what Machida said and what you have said...
Both fighters offered something different threat wise but Tito although showed little against him looked better than soko.

Soko looked out of his depth, maybe it was inexperience and nerves with it being his first UFC fight, tito was just made to look bad by a fighter who had him scouted perfectly. Although I think the same can be said for soko i think the real soko didn't turn up.


I dont know. I think Mach knew how to beat them both and that is what he did. Tito was not going to go quickly, so he knew it was a decision win he was gunning for. Soku would get better and more dangerous as time went on so he kept the pressure on and kept moving into him.

If you watch the fights it was two different strategies completely. in the Soku fight he moved in and forced take downs and kept real close so that Soku could not fire off bombs, in the Tito fight he kept his distance and worked on countering and stuffing the rushes.

_________________
Image

Even monkeys fall out of trees!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 29, 2008 8:40 am 
Offline
Brown(2) Belt
Brown(2) Belt

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
Posts: 1125
Location: Buxton, Derbyshire, UK (But Proud to be Welsh)
Yes i agree with that to the point that Machida had perfect tactics for both men, However Tito wasn't able to get his game off cos Machida wouldn't let him. Soku had the chance to get some good throws with his judo and he never really did.

Also when you look at the ground game in both fights, he dominated Soku and was the better agauinst tito but hardly complete domination like against Soku...thats all my point is. To all fans his win over Soku was fantastic display, against mma fans his win looked that over Tito....as fucked up as that sounds.

_________________
Love all mma, and big UFC fan but I do miss Pride.
And flying the flag for the UK... GO BISPING!
Absolutly love boxing and Calzaghe and Hatton are my Favourite fighters EVER!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 3:24 pm 
Offline
Red Belt
Red Belt

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 649
you guys type all you want but I am certain there was no style, no game plan for Ortiz to beat Machida. Ortiz is at least 2 classes lower than Machida so I'm convinced Machida gave him too much respect probably due to his name recognition and not what Ortiz could do to him.
The only surprise for all of us and Machida was that submission attempt which probably was Ortiz's best move in years :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:18 pm 
Offline
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:51 pm
Posts: 3555
Soko was atleast able to hurt Machida and make him panic. Tito didn't get a solid strike in all night.

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 31, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:12 pm
Posts: 5448
Location: Canada
Jewish-Spy wrote:
you guys type all you want but I am certain there was no style, no game plan for Ortiz to beat Machida. Ortiz is at least 2 classes lower than Machida so I'm convinced Machida gave him too much respect probably due to his name recognition and not what Ortiz could do to him.
The only surprise for all of us and Machida was that submission attempt which probably was Ortiz's best move in years :)


I agree totally. Machida did not go for it because he wanted a win and was a bit nervous that Titos name was not just a history lesson. Tito was not ready to finish that fight and was not ready for the technical striker.

FIG and JS are so right. I think if Tito comes back it would be interesting to feed him to Soku, but Dana wont prolong the pain. He just wants to be done with Tito....I personally think Tito is now in the same "freak show" catagory as Shammy and a few other old timers. Stick a fork in him...he is done.

_________________
Image

Even monkeys fall out of trees!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 6:38 am 
Offline
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 7:20 pm
Posts: 2432
Location: Knoxville, TN
So what's next for Machida?

_________________
Not to cross train cripples the martial arts, without it you can become a mechanic, but never an artist.
- E. Cates

Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts.
- Dan Gable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 7:57 am 
Offline
Brown(2) Belt
Brown(2) Belt

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
Posts: 1125
Location: Buxton, Derbyshire, UK (But Proud to be Welsh)
Well I think it's time they started thinking about number 1 contender fight for him, against who is the question but 1 more win and he should then get title fight.
I mean Wandi 1 and 1 so doesn't deserve to be no 1 contender. Chuck and shogun to me have to fight.
maybe a brizilian showdown with Thiago Silva???

Thats an aweome question GoW.

_________________
Love all mma, and big UFC fan but I do miss Pride.
And flying the flag for the UK... GO BISPING!
Absolutly love boxing and Calzaghe and Hatton are my Favourite fighters EVER!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:04 am 
Offline
Black Belt
Black Belt

Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2006 7:12 pm
Posts: 5448
Location: Canada
Mach will have one more fight to see if they can sell him as a contender. then maybe if he wins he will go for the belt. UFC is half marketability half earning a spot... I think he is half way their on both!

_________________
Image

Even monkeys fall out of trees!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:02 pm 
Offline
Red Belt
Red Belt

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 649
Yes Machida should have one more fight and win it decisevely then if he doesn't get the shot it's pure blasphemy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 12:04 pm 
Offline
Brown(2) Belt
Brown(2) Belt

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:35 am
Posts: 1125
Location: Buxton, Derbyshire, UK (But Proud to be Welsh)
Jewish-Spy wrote:
Yes Machida should have one more fight and win it decisevely then if he doesn't get the shot it's pure blasphemy


agree 100% as I said he has got to be in that bracket, but who does he fight for the chance to fight for the belt. There are so many inconsistant fighters in the LHW right now.
I must admit though I would love to see him piss over Rashad Evans, that would make me soo happy.

_________________
Love all mma, and big UFC fan but I do miss Pride.
And flying the flag for the UK... GO BISPING!
Absolutly love boxing and Calzaghe and Hatton are my Favourite fighters EVER!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: machida
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 1:04 pm 
Offline
Blue Belt
Blue Belt

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:40 am
Posts: 119
Location: DELRAN, NJ
I think Machida is a great fighter, just with a different style of fighting and I think UFC should give him a shot for the title even though I know it wont happen, at least not soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 3:19 pm 
Offline
Brown(3) Belt
Brown(3) Belt

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 1440
Well, Chuck is fighting someone at UFC 88, maybe it's Machida? I believe Shogun will not be fighting until UFC 89 or 90 so maybe a Machida vs Shogun. Winner gets Rampage/Griffin.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:52 pm 
Offline
Blue Belt
Blue Belt

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:40 am
Posts: 119
Location: DELRAN, NJ
Well i think Machida is(would) win regardless if it is Chuck or Shogun


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 9:00 pm 
Offline
Brown(3) Belt
Brown(3) Belt

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 8:43 am
Posts: 1440
Chuckles vs Machida would be too much of a tactical fight. Both are pretty much counter punchers. A Machida vs Shogun would be more intriquing - as Shogun is an aggressive fighter and quick enough to catch Machida.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Flash Games - TNX Invitation Code - TNX Review - Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group


Welcome to MMA-Forum.com
You are not logged in, which means that you can't post in the forums.
Click here to Register

If you are a current member here on MMA-Forum, please login below:

User:
Pass:
Log me on automatically each visit: