FEDORisGOD wrote:Wait, Kensei so according to you, all the UFC has to do is put on cards just a tad better than the competition is putting out and thats good enough for you?
Wow, thanks for putting words in my mouth...NO that is not what I said....I said they are no worse than others so bitching about their cards alone is kind of biased on your part. I am saying NO ONE is really putting on great cards, no one that will be around in a year....Afflictions cards seem to be to good to be true...
FEDORisGOD wrote:What ever happened to raising the bar? What ever happened to making a new standard in what a great card is and what it isnt?
Grow the frig up....What happened to it? It never ever existed kid...it is a MONEY GAME and the UFC is winning. They will be around in five years for sure and maybe ten. they will be putting on decent cards while others try and topple them, only to bleed money like a Hemophilliac in a razor blade factory, and die quickly! Raise the bar...you are funny...Do you live in a world were "dreams come true" and " if you build it they will come" are not just things of movies but reality....please, you of all people know the "raise the bar" stuff is a joke. If they are making money they put on fights that are entertaining and fun, but mostly they dont blow their whole load in one thrust like a 16 year old on prom night!
FEDORisGOD wrote:Dana doesnt need Randy and Fedor to make "Dream Matches."
I know that, I was refering to his "dream matches" that he was talking about when he still used that catch phrase.
FEDORisGOD wrote:Why is Chuck fighting Rashad? Why not a rematch with Jardine? Why is Hammill fighting Franklin? Why not a rematch vs. Bisping which makes the fight exciting AND controvercial?
You should have joe silvas job...hell I should have joe silvas job...Why point the finger at the president of the organization over the fight maker? Why not point the finger at the Ferdeitas for not pushing for the better fights, now that one of the Fn brothers is more involved, why not actually attack the owners...Oh, yah...because Dana said "FUCK YOU" one to many times and is the ugly bald face of the UFC. Please, why is he not fighting jardine....because he isnt. Maybe he will fight him next...I dont know. But that is a great set up fight.
FEDORisGOD wrote:Why? Ill tell you why. Because UFC doesnt care about pleasing the fans. They care about making their money and protecting guys they can make money off.
DUH!
FIG, I like reading your stuff you have a way of stating the obvious!
And I am only poking you to see what else you will say.....I agree with you on almost all your points, I just think we all have to realize that the UFC is a FOR PROFIT business, and one that is doing a damn fine job of hitting their goal of FOR PROFIT! They only care about what we say as long as we pay. ergo, they put on good cards with one or two great cards. But with one fight a month they can not all be diamonds.
FEDORisGOD wrote:FUCKING GARBAGE. IF THEIR CARDS ARE ONLY A "LITTLE" BETTER THANT HE COMPETITION's THEN THEY DONT DESERVE TO BE THE #1 ORG IN THE US.
Now I am confused....So if you are running a race or set of races, and your time is only "just a LITTE BETTER" then the next guy...You dont deserve to be number one.....Interesting! WRONG, but interesting. This statement shows how "anti ufc" you can be. Think about it and tell me...the only response I really want is to this question......
WHY does the UFC have to be "WAY" better than the rest to garner the number one possition? Why does consistantly a little better not make them simply a bit better? Why the double standard?
FEDORisGOD wrote:YEa, they are the NBA, but in the NBA we get exciting games every day. UFC puts on garbage 80% of the year.
As a NBA fan I can tell you that you are full of shit!
The NBA puts on 70% crap match ups. Always has and always will.....take a week end of matches and you get to see that if 10 games are played at least 5 of them are crap squash matches and 2 are games between the worst of the worst! and that is on a good week end.....
My point in all of this is that you are slamming the UFC for having shit cards and sounding very "against" the UFC, but really they are not that bad in the whole mix of things. Are they the Best by far...No! are they the worst?...NO! are they better than everyone?... Most if not all other companies that have had more than three shows (takeing affliction out of the argument) are worse over all to the UFC. They could do much better but calling their card shit and not acknowledging that no one is doing any better is just sounding to much like an attack on them specifically!
Saying that they suck and not saying they suck...and so does everyone else right now just comesa across as bitter and closed minded! Personal agendas aside, they are not that bad and have made some great fights in the last while. They are the face of MMA and the big show for 99.9% of us.